Who has been the Rangers MVP so far?

Rick Nash

Henrik Lundqvist

Marc Staal

Ryan McDonagh














The Price Of Success
The Blackhawks built their championship team mainly from within as many would like the Rangers to do. But this offseason has proven that the Salary Cap can hurt even teams built "the right way"...


Kris Versteeg was traded to Toronto


Kris Versteeg was traded to Toronto

Since Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Finals the Blackhawks have traded five players from their active roster (Ben Eager, Kris Versteeg, Dustin Byfuglien, Andrew Ladd, and Brent Sopel). 

These five players accounted for 22 of the ‘Hawks 78 playoff goals and 62 of the team’s 271 regular season tallies.  Of the 22 playoff markers, eight were game-winners, meaning half of Chicago’s playoff victories were decided by these players. 

Chicago is also likely to lose two more players, John Madden and Nick Boynton, via free agency, or possibly retirement in Boynton’s case, before the summer is over.  And don’t forget that during the year the ‘Hawks traded promising young defenseman Cam Barker.

It’s not uncommon for a championship team to lose a few key parts in the ensuing offseason, but usually this happens through free agency when other teams overpay solid, if not spectacular players because of their roles on the winning team.  But the Blackhawks lost their five key players because they simply couldn’t afford to keep the gang together. 

There’s no mistaking who Chicago considers to be its core following all these moves.  Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews, Marian Hossa, Patrick Sharp, Duncan Keith, Brent Seabrook, Niklas Hjalmarsson, and Antti Niemi are the unquestioned leaders of the ‘Hawks.  But given their financial state, the Blackhawks were forced to part with some of their talented young players they would have much preferred to keep.

Chicago was only in position to win the Stanley Cup in the first place because of impressive drafting and player development, but the success in this area that brought the Blackhawks a championship cost them many of the players that helped deliver it. 

The truth is that while most successful NHL teams have realized that building from within is the best recipe for success, nowhere in the NHL rules does it say that it’s the only or recommended way to build a team.  The ‘Hawks have done an enviable job in getting to the top of the mountain, but the constraints of the Salary Cap apply the same for them as for teams hiring mercenaries. 

It’s disheartening to watch an organization build its roster “the right way” and have to dismantle it weeks after winning it all, but such are the consequences of success.  The Blackhawks won because they groomed players into stars, and they lost those players because they developed into stars that deserved significant pay raises. 

The Blackhawks deserve kudos for building a team of mainly homegrown talent, but it doesn’t mean they get a reward. 

The truth is there’s no infallible way to build a team.  Building from within seems like the best way but the ‘Hawks have proven that it can present the same problems as signing free agents to massive deals.  The Salary Cap ensures that a team can only pay a certain number of top players, whether they’re from within the organization or elsewhere. 

The ultimate goal in the NHL is sustained success.  The Blackhawks won a title this year, and are undoubtedly a contender for next season.  But considering the impact the players they parted with had throughout the season, Chicago is certainly weaker now than it was a few months ago.  Though they’ve maintained their young identity, it can’t have been easy for management or fans to wave goodbye to key cogs of their title team. 

The good news for the ‘Hawks is that they turned most of their former assets into future assets, by acquiring draft picks and prospects who could one day fill the same roles as the players they replaced. 

But it’s no guarantee.  Maybe Nick Leddy, Jeremy Morin, Kevin Hayes, Justin Holl, Viktor Stalberg, Ivan Vishnevsky, Philippe Paradis, Christopher DiDomenico, et al. will one day help guide the ‘Hawks through the playoffs to another title.  But maybe some of Chicago’s newest prospects will not develop as well as the former Blackhawks and the team will struggle a bit with its depth.

Chicago achieved every team’s ultimate goal, but just as quickly the Blackhawks were forced to take apart their team.  Considering the stars they’ve retained, the ‘Hawks are a good bet to contend for several years.  But they couldn’t avoid the wrath of the Salary Cap, for better or worse. 

 

Posted by Kevin Baumer | July 14, 2010 at 02:03 pm
Comments

While you may be right to a degree Kevin. They strayed from their "right way" to go out and get 3 highly priced UFAs and handcuff themselves worse than sather has handcuffed us that they couldn't keep any of the young promising players. Without Huet (5.6 mil; 2 more years), Campbell (7.1; 6 more years) and Hossa (5.3; 10 more years) on that roster they would be fine right now and may have lost a player. The price of them winning 1 championship was way higher than the cost of not winning one and waiting for a championship by allowing the youngsters to develop for a couple more years into all around superstars.

The blackhawks wanted a championship so bad they risked the future of their team.

Posted by: kwill | July 14, 2010 at 05:08 pm

i was going to say what kwill said although he said it better. huet, campbell and hossa not home grown and very expensive and with the possible exception of hossa pretty impossible to trade. and none can be sent to minors until training cap so does not help meet summer camp of 10% above regular camp

that plus the bonuses of 4 mm for winning the cup really cost the hawks some really good young players like versteeg and big buff as well as some others

Posted by: LI Joe | July 14, 2010 at 05:40 pm

cap not camp

Posted by: LI Joe | July 14, 2010 at 05:42 pm

Guess it all depends on the goal, throwing everything at one championship is certainly one goal...but with the pieces the 'Hawks have that are young, multiple rings should be the goal to me. You're right that Huet and Campbell are crippling them worse than anything. I expect Huet (their Redden) to be sent to the minors. Campbell is decent but obviously not worth the money. And every team would like Hossa. Would they have won without Hossa? Hard to say. Can they win without the guys they've traded? We'll see

Posted by: Kevin Baumer | July 14, 2010 at 06:08 pm

One way to "reward" teams for building from within would be to give them a cap break on players that have been in their system. For example, if a player is on your team for 5 years, and his salary is 1M, you might get a 10% cap discount; so he would only count for $900,000. Maybe over 10 years would be 15%. Just a thought.

Posted by: Anthony | July 15, 2010 at 02:04 pm

Anthony, Its an interesting thought and I think a lot of people support the homegrown roster concept and would like the idea. But the league doesn't care how teams are built. Building from within is proven to work and it makes sense. Logically everyone should do it, but its not required. The league wants 30 teams, it doesn't care if every team is built from mercenaries or completely from within.
I don't think there should be incentive for it doing it one way or another. The results on the ice should be incentive enough

Posted by: Kevin Baumer | July 15, 2010 at 03:02 pm

i think the league wants more than 30 teams and will have at least 2 more after the new cba is done or within 2 yrs of that. the owners and bettman love those fees. so expect 32 teams, even though they s/b going the other way and reducing to 26 or even 24.

and regarding hossa. he'll be 32 in january and will start to fade sooner rather than later. so i'm not that sure lots of teams really want to take on that contract with those many yrts left for a soon to be 32 yr old.

Posted by: LI Joe | July 15, 2010 at 03:20 pm

I'm going to agree with Joe on the teams front here. Bettman is determined to expand the league to 32 teams and have the same number as the other 3 major sports. It will continue to dilute the talent of the league, but it could help the league expand overseas players with 50 or so more spots open at the NHL level.

While contraction would be a much better way of doing things, it's a hard proposal to make since there is already a team there (and they aren't hemmoraging money) and it indicates to major media outlets that the league is dying. That's really the last thing the sport needs. No other league is complaining about diluted talent, some teams are just bad in every sport. Whether the owner lacks the willingness to spend to win, or they keep getting the short end of the stick with prospects (see Baltimore Orioles).

I know this is brought up a lot here since we never seem to have any of it for very long, but chemistry is what makes the homegrown teams work. Chicago's team had amazing chemistry on each and every line by the end of this run. Without that, Nashville could have taken them out in the first round. So even with a homegrown team, if you haven't drafted the right pieces it doesn't matter because it won't click (look at the Panthers). For a Mercenary built team it's a matter of the willingness for the merc to adjust to the play style of the team and the coach to get them in the system. We could go up and down the list of mercs that didn't bother to adjust to players on our team to make them both succeed (looks north toward montreal).

So yes, the league doesn't care which way a team is built. IMO The best way to built a team is really a healthy balance of the 2. Having the combination of home grown talent (majority) mixed with mercs to supplement that and replace failed/underachieving draft picks or put you over the top appears to be the right answer. But it has to be the right combination of the 2, not just signing someone for the sake of signing someone (Sather).

Posted by: kwill | July 16, 2010 at 09:54 am

NEW YORK -- The New York Rangers have acquired defenceman Matt McCue from the Anaheim Ducks for forward Tomas Zaborsky.

McCue, 22, spent the 2009-10 season with Manitoba of the AHL and Bakersfield of the ECHL. He was originally signed by Anaheim as a free agent Dec. 30, 2008, and has yet to play in an NHL game.

Zaborsky played in 41 games this season with Assat Pori of the Finnish Elite League, registering nine goals and 17 assists. He was the Rangers' fifth-round pick, No. 137 overall, in the 2006 draft.

Posted by: njaco1215 | July 19, 2010 at 04:57 pm
Comments:
Name:
E-mail Address:
Type this below: Reload the image


New York Rangers VS Boston Bruins
Saturday, May 25, 2013

  1 2 3 OT F
Rangers 1 0 0 - 1
Bruins 0 2 1 - 3







Rick Nash comes to Broadway...





Check out the great sports ticket deals at CTC, including NFL and NHL tickets! Buy New York Rangers tickets, NY Islanders tickets, tickets to Devils hockey, Philadelphia Flyers tickets, Minnesota Wild games and Detroit Red Wings tickets.





http://www.partypoker.com/





Ready for NFL action? We have great seats at all games. Look at these New England Patriots tickets, Dallas Cowboys tickets, Atlanta Falcons tickets, Pittsburgh Steelers tickets, and Denver Broncos tickets. Check out our cheap tickets to Jacksonville Jaguars, New York Jets, New York Giants, and Philadelphia Eagles. All our tickets are top quality!








Powered by Interstellar Bot 3.0.180